Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 03:59
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
An Extreme Drop in Oxygen Will Eventually Suffocate Most Life on Earth - ScienceAlert
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
How do you feel about the impending end of what Donald Trump calls "the Green New scam"?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
The Best Late-Night Snack to Lower Cholesterol, According to Dietitians - EatingWell
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Drug deaths plummet among young Americans as fentanyl carnage eases - NPR
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What is the future of AI in interior design?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
The Surprising Way Five Days Of Junk Food Impacts Your Brain - MindBodyGreen